Category: Tarot

monday oct 4

Eight of Coins

today, I pulled the 8 of coins, which in the Raider-Waite-Coleman deck is depicted as a young craftsman in a workshop, diligently plying the pentacled disks representative of the suit. fitting that I’ve been working straight through since this morning, first on a bunch of boring start-of-the-week library operation stuff, then on wrapping up a couple portfolio items for my MLIS program that demonstrate my competency in areas D (“Apply the fundamental principles of planning, management, marketing, and advocacy”) and G (Demonstrate understanding of basic principles and standards involved in organizing information such as classification and controlled vocabulary systems, cataloging systems, metadata schemas or other systems for making information accessible to a particular clientele).

but I’m sick of that and I intended on writing here today, because I need to square up against myself a little wrt what I want to do. I am a cagey, aloof person; self-revelation and “oversharing” do not come naturally to me. additionally, I am paranoid about online surveillance, both by the machines and by witch-hunters. I strive to clearly perceive and confront myself through writing, even though I don’t usually write publicly in anything resembling realist narration about, idk, my romantic troubles or my mundane behavior. relatedly I have been known to speak disparagingly of opmhalaskeptical writing, the province of personal blogs.

however, I know this won’t work out in the long run. I bore myself when I write too much in my head, enumerating neurosis and abstracted considerations without referent to tangible, lived life. so part of what this blog is for is training myself to be less cerebral and more visceral, and for hardening myself against the horror of exposure. writing that has a chance of doing the tyrannically narcissistic thing I want it to do, ie let me influence other’s impression of the world, requires making an example of myself on the knowledge that what I present is intended to stimulate reflection or to otherwise provoke. which means like, knowingly and willingly shedding less-than-favorable light on my actions and desires, and refraining from passing public judgement myself. this is basically the only valuable thing someone can learn from the example of stand up comedy.

but, like, it’s not that I am embarrassed to say I watch bukkake porn or whatever. it’s sort of that I think it’s kind of boring to talk about myself and so I don’t think anyone cares what happens to me in my boring little life. or if I’m in a grandiose mood, the role of self-aggrandizing diva comes easy, but I generally avoid venting vitriol and petty grievances—the most intense of my motivations—as public writing because….well, in part because I previously had people in my life who would demand explanation for anything like that, and because I don’t want my artistic efforts to cause strife in my personal relationships. however, being an artist means accepting the consequences of your efforts no matter what, with the corollary that anticipated negative consequences are not in themselves sufficient reason to forego the effort. and most people around me now have been nothing but supportive of my work. and stating intentions or desires publicly is a powerful tool for self-catalysis. so, as it always is, when I am most hesitant about expressing something strongly felt, that’s when I’m on the right path.

right now I’m conscientiously staying “in my head” because this isn’t some coy evasion, like I have something “real” in mind that I’m not talking about. but tomorrow I plan to write a new moon report, something I want to do consistently, and I think it would be best to try narrativizing my experience rather than my thoughts. maybe I’ll even say a few things to make sure I’m embarrassed about it.

kafka, listening to bright eyes, dons his tinfoil hat before logging on

well now. here we are. a gen-you-whine, paid-server-space blog. it’s been years now I’ve tried blogging in various capacities, on blogspot, tumblr—hell, on xanga, if we go all the way back to sixth grade. maybe I should’ve got on xanga instead….anyway. previous efforts obviously fizzled out, else you’d be reading me there, or I’d be published & Internet Famous by now. natch, my newsletter is still an active project, but something about the newsletter format, with the minor intrusion of reaching into your inbox, demands greater care than what I would like to exercise here.

what exactly do I want to do here? you want a list of demands? write regularly, of course. learn. hopefully entertain you. try to avoid social media platforms that warp impulses towards self-expression into something akin to a gambling addiction comorbid with reality-TV narcissism. experiment. build a little portfolio of varied writing, if ever the opportunity arises to share as much. risk pissing people off, for which I do not apologize in advance. who knows, maybe I’ll even motivate myself to Live My Life.

so I’m casting my lot in with cranks of internet yore, their alternate theories and fearmongering about the NWO. American writers, especially male writers; well, white male writers; by which I mean, white male writers of psychotic Yankee stock, we carry on the legacy of the US’s true national heroes, PT Barnum and Cotton Mather, the huckster and the paranoid fanatic—two synonyms for “blogger” if there ever were.

blog blog blog blog blog blog blog

the fates are measuring out the future of writing & reading. traditional publishing, inc., is Not Well, perhaps moribund. even if it were 60 years ago, publishing’s capture by capital would have posed many of the same dilemmas faced by writers now—though not many writers then saw dilemmas, only opportunities. the plan’s to let myself get a lil less than respectable, see, and maybe that’s where the truth with a magic capital T is.

this will also be where i finally do some public astrology writing, something I’m very good at thank you very much, but talk about oversaturated. not now though, because to change things up (“change,” get it??), let’s christen this by consulting the I Ching.

I’ve thrown the I Ching I think 2 times, I’m not super familiar with it and honestly it intimidates me way more than my preferred divinatory method, the tarot. (the tarot card I pulled for this post was the two of cups reversed. something I can’t help but notice every time I pull the two of cups is how confrontational the two figures’ faces appear as they reach for one another in a gesture of ostensible Love and Recognition, or so the card is often interpreted. during an extended is-it-really-a-break-up break-up, I consulted the tarot. the two of cups upright occupied the “result” position in the draw, prophesying reconciliation, I thought, projecting. turns out it was, in fact, a break-up.)

I-Ching-wise, we have hexagram 52, 艮, gen, “keeping still, mountain.” all my I Ching interpretation is based on the classic Wilhelm/Baynes translation, the one in a yellow book with a foreword from Carl Jung. I’ll get more into how the I Ching works, what the lines mean and the method for divination, in later posts, but right now the primary concern is the auspices under which I’m launching this blog.

hexagram 52, 艮, gen, “keeping still, mountain”

“the hexagram signifies the end and the beginning of all movement….when a man has thus become calm, he may turn to the outside world. he no longer sees in it the struggle and tumult of individual beings, and therefore he has the that true peace of mind which is needed for understanding the great laws of the universe and for acting in harmony with them.”

the hexagram is masculine/closed on top, indicating completed extension into the heavens, and feminine/open at the base, where it draws on subterranean forces to support the extension. the balance of energies is whence the hexagram gets its name “keeping still,” which is a good metaphor for the I Ching’s opinion of stillness: the world is always dynamic, changing, never static. anything appearing stable has harmonized the polarity of existence; it has not escaped the flux. the commentary suggests that this harmonized stillness is the perspective from which it is possible to “see things intuitively as they really are.” I am being called to pause “at the beginning,” without having “abandoned truth,” so I can “find the right way.”

what I’m seeing here is that I’m finally approaching the task of blogging free from anxious, career-driven striving. this blog will be a place for meditation and consideration, and as the commentary notes, results cannot be forced when practicing meditation. inducing calmness by demanding false composure will only produce crude approximations of what is possible. the ego has not yet been quieted, but the stage is set for a more pure devotion to thought.

somewhat ironic given the circumstances that I’m being reminded “if a man is reserved in speech, his words take ever more definite form, and every occasion for regret vanishes.” blogging about whatever the hell I feel like might not qualify as being “reserved in speech,” but effacing every occasion of regret as my words take ever more definite form certainly sounds promising.

final thought: the blog will provide me the opportunity to “maintain tranquility,” a retreat for cultivating the luminosity inherent in composure. or something. the I Ching is still kind of foreign to me, but that’s the point of this blog, to do some public thinking and learn about what I want to learn about.

so welcome, thanks for joining. I’ll be here, high on my mountain.